Runyon v. McCrary
| Runyon v. McCrary | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued April 26, 1976 Decided June 25, 1976 | |
| Full case name | Runyon, et ux., dba Bobbe's School v. McCrary, et al. |
| Citations | 427 U.S. 160 (more) 96 S. Ct. 2586, 49 L. Ed. 2d 415, 1976 U.S. LEXIS 7 |
| Holding | |
| Federal law prohibits private schools from discriminating on the basis of race. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Stewart, joined by Burger, Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, Stevens |
| Concurrence | Powell |
| Concurrence | Stevens |
| Dissent | White, joined by Rehnquist |
| Laws applied | |
| Civil Rights Act of 1866 | |
| This article is part of a series on |
| Education in the United States |
|---|
| Summary |
| Curriculum topics |
| Education policy issues |
| Levels of education |
 Education portal United States portal |
Runyon v. McCrary, 427 U.S. 160 (1976), was a landmark case by the United States Supreme Court, which ruled that private schools that discriminate on the basis of race or establish racial segregation are in violation of federal law.[1] Whereas Brown v. Board of Education barred segregation by public schools, this case barred segregation in private schools. This decision is built on Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. another landmark civil rights case that affirmed the federal government's ability to penalize racist acts by private actors.
Dissenting Justices Byron White and William Rehnquist (who allegedly opposed Brown v. Board of Education for parts of his life) argued that the legislative history of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (popularly known as the Civil Rights Act of 1866) indicated that the Act was not designed to prohibit private racial discrimination, but only state-sponsored racial discrimination (as had been held in the Civil Rights Cases of 1883).
Background
[edit]Two African American students filed suit believing that they were denied admission to private schools in Virginia based on their race. Michael McCrary and Colin Gonzales were denied admission to Bobbe's School; Gonzales was also denied admission to Fairfax-Brewster School. A class action was filed against the schools by the parents of both students. A federal district court ruled for McCrary and Gonzales, finding that the school's admission policies were racially discriminatory. The United States Court of Appeals affirmed the decision.
Russell and Katheryne Runyon d.b.a Bobbe's School and Fairfax-Brewster School were schools in Northern Virginia. Bobbe's was founded in 1958 as a segregation academy with five European-American students. By 1972 it had grown to 200, but had never admitted a black child.[1] Fairfax-Brewster had a similar history from 1955.
Questions before the Court
[edit]- Were the admission policies of the private schools in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981?[2]
- Did the Ku Klux Klan Act violate the Constitutional right to privacy and free association?
Decision of the Supreme Court
[edit]In a 7–2 decision Justice Stewart wrote the opinion for the Court. The Court determined that the Ku Klux Klan Act prohibited the racially discriminatory policies of the schools. While the schools were private, Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. held that the Ku Klux Klan Act applied to "purely private acts of racial discrimination". Further, Stewart wrote that the school's admission policies were "classical violation[s] of Section 1981". The Court acknowledged that parents had the right to send their children to schools that "promote the belief [of] racial segregation", but that neither parents' nor students' freedom of association was violated by the application of 42 U.S.C. §1981.[3] The Court cited Pierce v. Society of Sisters and the right of the State "reasonably to regulate all schools" to further justify the decision.[4]
Dissenting opinion
[edit]Justice White was concerned about the potential far-reaching impact of holding private racial discrimination illegal, which, if taken to its logical conclusion, might ban many varied forms of voluntary self-segregation, including social and advocacy groups that limited their membership to blacks.[5]
Runyon's holding was severely limited by Patterson v. McLean Credit Union,[6] which narrowly construed Section 1981 as not applying to any discrimination occurring after the making of a contract, such as racial harassment on the job (although the Patterson majority expressly claimed that they were not overruling Runyon). In turn, Patterson was legislatively overruled by the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
See also
[edit]- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 427
- Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409 (1968)
- Brown v. Board of Education (similar case, but involved public schools)
References
[edit]- ^ a b Runyon v. McCrary, 427 U.S. 160 (1976).
- ^ 42 U.S.C. § 1981.
- ^ McClain, Linda C. (2019). "' "Male Chauvinism" Is Under Attack From All Sides at Present': Roberts v. United States Jaycees, Sex Discrimination, and the First Amendment". Fordham Law Review. 87: 2390. Retrieved November 26, 2019.
- ^ "Runyon v. McCrary 427 U.S. 160 (1976)". The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. Retrieved October 7, 2013.
- ^ See 427 U.S. 212 (White, J., dissenting): "Whether such conduct should be condoned or not, whites and blacks will undoubtedly choose to form a variety of associational relationships pursuant to contracts which exclude members of the other race. Social clubs, black and white, and associations designed to further the interests of blacks or whites are but two examples."
- ^ Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. 164 (1989).
Further reading
[edit]- Bogdanski, John A. (1977). "Section 1981 and the Thirteenth Amendment after Runyon v. McCrary. On the Doorsteps of Discriminatory Private Clubs". Stanford Law Review. 29 (4). Stanford Law Review, Vol. 29, No. 4: 747–793. doi:10.2307/1228260. JSTOR 1228260.
External links
[edit]- Text of Runyon v. McCrary, 427 U.S. 160 (1976) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)